| This account will be, or has already been, disabled |
| While this account is going to be disabled due to the nature of the account name, the person who was using this account is absolutely welcome (and encouraged) to edit the wiki. Please close this account yourself by clicking "settings" in the upper right hand corner, change your email address from username@host to username+disabled@host and then press Save. Then scroll down to the bottom and use the "Disable Forever" option. That will allow you to use the same email address to signup again under your name. For further information please read Welcome to the Wiki. |
| If you have questions about this you can ask for help. |
Bizarro is Daniel Lee Urazandi, owner of Bizarro World.
2010-01-17 11:57:32 Welcome to the Wiki. I hope that things work out and you'll stick around the wiki after this particular issue is resolved. —JasonAller
2010-01-24 14:12:47 I left a note for usagigaijin about the comment you removed. If you were editing under your real name my comment to them about their choice of user name would have had more impact. I can't say I'm real enthusiastic about their comment being removed, but I felt they deserved a note to let them know that it had occurred even if they are just a disgruntled ebay customer. If you are Dan, stand behind your words as Dan, an individual and member of both the Davis and Davis Wiki communities. —JasonAller
2010-02-01 14:34:56 "Real vote?" There were two or three votes before that one. CovertProfessor started one saying "yes or no on version 147." I expanded it to four diffent options in a second vote. WesHardaker came in to make it even more specific: 6 bullet points that were addressed specifically. His sixth one, about a clean slate/archival, is what you then wanted in your newest vote. As it is, I think WesHardaker's current 6-point vote is probably the most fair. It covers every detail currently being contested as a separate issue, rather than lumping it all together. Clearly, people voting yes on any of those proposals would be an automatic no on your "real vote" anyway. —EdWins
2010-02-01 14:47:40 Why are you re-added your "real vote?" The poll, as written, includes all of the possible options. You're disrupting people's edits and making it difficult for people to contribute to the discussion. —PhilipNeustrom
2010-02-01 14:50:32 What's more, your poll doesn't work. It's a compound question, making it impossible to vote meaningfully. PN's 6 points include all 4 of yours, plus 2 others. —TomGarberson
2010-02-02 11:30:02 How about we go back to my vote? I put it up days before you put yours up. —WilliamLewis
2012-07-19 21:10:15 can you
be nicer to your customers —MicahPerez
Comments:
You must be logged in to comment on this page. Please log in.